Three out of eight clerks in building authorities will retire over the next few years. Their successors are left with empty folders, overflowing email inboxes, and Excel spreadsheets that no one can explain anymore. How can a public authority preserve knowledge that was never documented because it existed only in one person's head? Stackfield brings together projects, communication, and documentation in centralized rooms instead of adding yet another isolated knowledge base alongside specialist applications, SharePoint, and Outlook. Knowledge is captured where work happens and remains within the organization, even after staff changes.
The essentials at a glance
- Retirement wave as a catalyst: According to a McKinsey study (2023), the German public sector is expected to face a shortage of around 840,000 unfilled full-time positions by 2030 due to retirements. Knowledge that has never been documented disappears with the people who leave.
- Data protection as a prerequisite: Public authorities in Germany cannot use tools that put sensitive administrative data at risk. Any knowledge management solution must therefore be GDPR-compliant, store data in Germany or the EU, and meet public sector compliance requirements.
- Preserve knowledge in the context of daily work: Stackfield brings together documents, tasks, and discussions in centralized rooms protected by true end-to-end encryption. Knowledge is captured where work happens, not in a separate system that no one maintains.
- Staff transitions without knowledge loss: Dedicated handover rooms preserve expertise, decisions, and processes in a structured way, making them accessible to successors instead of leaving them in the mind of a single employee.
Preserve knowledge before the next retirement wave Instead of leaving valuable expertise in private inboxes and the minds of individual clerks, you can test Stackfield free for 14 days with a real pilot area of your choice, for example in the building authority or the school administration.
Start preserving knowledge today
Why do traditional knowledge management approaches fail in public authorities?
Three out of eight clerks in the building authority will leave the administration over the next few years, while their successors require between twelve and eighteen months of onboarding. Filing cabinets, Outlook inboxes, and Excel spreadsheets are no substitute for a structured approach. The real challenge is tacit knowledge: Who knows which special cases exist? Which property developers require a particular approach? Where are the common bottlenecks when coordinating with the district administration? This knowledge disappears with the individual because it was never documented.
The same patterns can be found in almost every public authority:
- nformal conversations and ad hoc exchanges replace a documented system.
- SharePoint wikis remain empty because specialized knowledge is rarely shared voluntarily.
- Shared drives become data graveyards where everything is stored "just in case", but nothing can be found when it is actually needed.
Simply accumulating more tools does not create knowledge management. It creates tool sprawl without a sustainable structure.
Selection criteria for knowledge management tools: What Public Authorities need to consider
Public authorities in Germany evaluate tools based on a number of mandatory criteria, including:
The CLOUD Act issue is determined by the provider's jurisdiction and where data is hosted, not by the encryption mechanism. Day-to-day usability is just as important. A tool that is not actively used will never preserve knowledge.
The following table compares three key decision factors that typically shape the tool selection process in public administration:
| Dimension |
Option A |
Option B |
Relevance for Public Authorities |
| Hosting |
Cloud (US provider) |
Sovereign cloud (Germany / EU) |
Data residency and provider jurisdiction are critical |
| Functionality |
Standalone tool (e. g. a wiki only) |
Integrated platform |
Tool consolidation reduces licensing and maintenance effort |
| Implementation effort |
Extensive training required |
Intuitive user interface |
Limited IT resources in municipalities require a low barrier to adoption |
Organization size as a decision framework
The right solution depends heavily on the size of the administration:
Small municipalities with fewer than 100 employees are particularly vulnerable to the loss of knowledge held by individual key employees and need a streamlined platform that can be introduced without a lengthy rollout.
Medium-sized city administrations with between 500 and 2,000 employees benefit from a pilot-area approach because cross-departmental projects and increasing compliance requirements come together.
State and federal authorities with more than 2,000 employees require centralized coordination, procurement compliance reviews, and longer implementation cycles. Smaller administrations are structurally more vulnerable: when a single person leaves, an entire area of expertise often disappears with them.
Knowledge management with Stackfield: Rooms, documents, and tasks as one central system
Stackfield brings together documents, to-do lists and task management, Whiteboards, internal communication, thread-based discussions, and audio / video conferencing in centralized rooms. Knowledge is created in the context of daily work instead of being documented afterward in a separate system that no one maintains. A meeting, a building permit application, a procurement process: discussions, decisions, and outcomes are all stored within the same structure and can be accessed through the global search.
The following features are particularly relevant for public authorities:
- Pages (and page templates) for meeting minutes, guidelines, and structured process documentation, ensuring that workflows are accessible to everyone instead of remaining in the minds of individual employees.
- Discussions for topic-specific collaboration instead of scattered chat histories, making decisions transparent and traceable even months later.
- Global search across all rooms, documents, and tasks, eliminating the need to search through folder structures or email inboxes.
- Collaborative Office suite powered by Collabora for editing documents together without relying on Microsoft.
- Task templates and recurring tasks (task management) for standardized workflows, ensuring that procurement processes, application handling, and onboarding are structured and repeatable.
When a clerk retires, a dedicated handover room is created containing tasks with ongoing cases, pages documenting special cases, and comment histories explaining key decisions. Their successor can immerse themselves in the existing context instead of inheriting empty folders, ensuring that valuable institutional knowledge remains within the organization rather than disappearing with the former employee's private inbox.
Data hosting in Germany, ISO 27001 certification, BSI C5 attestation, true end-to-end encryption, and multi-language telephone support make Stackfield a secure solution for the public sector.
Knowledge management in practice: How municipalities use Stackfield
Two public administration use cases demonstrate the range of Stackfield's applications: intermunicipal collaboration between several municipalities in Hesse on the one hand, and specialized school administration in the district of Leipzig on the other. Both examples illustrate the same principle: knowledge management is not created by introducing a separate tool, but by consistently using a shared workspace where tasks, discussions, and documents exist side by side.
City of Gießen: Sharing knowledge across municipalities
As part of the "Total Digital" funding project within the "Digitale Kommune@Hessen" intermunicipal cooperation initiative, the City of Gießen works together with five other municipalities in Hesse. Previously, communication relied on emails and Word documents, with important decisions disappearing into individual inboxes.
Today, OKR sprints are managed in dedicated Stackfield rooms. In practice, this means:
- Midterm Goals, Objectives, and Key Results are documented as task cards and assigned directly to the responsible participants
- Meeting minutes are recorded as pages and supplemented with checklists, making outstanding items immediately visible in the next meeting
- Appointments, regular meetings, and absences across all participating municipalities are managed in a shared calendar
- Surveys are used to support decision-making processes
- External participants are included through role-based permissions: long-term collaborators join as full members, while short-term contributors are invited as guests
The underlying principle is straightforward: all project-related communication takes place within the appropriate Stackfield rooms. Information remains centralized and accessible to all participating municipalities, even after the project has ended.
"I used to have several hundred emails in my inbox. Now, at the end of the workday, I might have seven."
Hendrik Schaus, Head of Organizational Development & Digital Strategy, City of Gießen
District of Leipzig: Preserving knowledge in school administration
Within the IT department, Marco Wüste and his small team coordinate the digital infrastructure of ten schools. As he explains: "We quickly realized that we needed a tool that would help us manage our daily workload. Thousands of sticky notes around my keyboard that eventually disappeared were simply not an option."
Today, room groups organize work by topic. One room group contains a dedicated room for each school to manage procurement requests, while another groups together rooms for system administration, inventory management, and invoice processing. The key mechanisms for preserving knowledge in the Leipzig District Administration include:
- Task templates standardize recurring procurement processes, including every individual step. Procedural knowledge no longer exists only in one person's head but is available for every case
- Email integration automatically converts incoming invoices into tasks, ensuring that no information is lost in an inbox
- The reporting function provides a cross-room overview of all open tasks across every school room
- The Mobile App allows tasks to be created directly on site at the schools
"I used to spend a lot of time filing documents on a file server, and then the search would begin. Today, I simply open the folder management within the room and immediately find what I'm looking for."
Marco Wüste, IT Coordinator, School Administration / Culture Department, District of Leipzig
Implementing knowledge management in public administration: Introducing tools in five steps
Implementations rarely fail because of the tool itself. They fail because of a lack of structure and leadership support. Organizations that start without a pilot area, without clearly defined responsibilities, and without a cultural framework simply create new data graveyards.
- Knowledge inventory (2–4 weeks): Identify key personnel, knowledge monopolies, and critical processes.
- Define a pilot area (2–3 months): Select one department with a clear need and strong intrinsic motivation.
- Tool selection with procurement compliance review (variable): Evaluate GDPR compliance, BSI C5, data residency, and ease of use.
- Rollout with change management (6–12 months): Train multipliers and communicate clear ground rules across the organization.
- Annual cleanup of data graveyards (ongoing): Remove outdated content and continuously refine the information structure.
The tool itself can be introduced quickly. What takes longer, and requires stronger leadership, is the cultural change behind it. Without that, even the best platform will remain unused.
Creating acceptance: Involving employees from the very beginning
Acceptance is not created through instructions but through tangible benefits. Four approaches have proven particularly effective:
- Start with a small pilot area where motivation is already high.
- Managers should lead by example and use the platform themselves.
- Integrate knowledge management into daily workflows instead of creating separate maintenance routines.
- Demonstrate clear time savings, such as fewer emails and less time spent searching for information.
Traditional knowledge management methods work when they are embedded in day-to-day work rather than treated as separate documentation exercises. In Stackfield, this can be implemented in practical ways:
- Knowledge handovers become structured handover rooms containing tasks for ongoing cases, pages documenting special cases, and discussions with complete decision histories instead of a Word document that no one can find.
- Expert Debriefings and Lessons Learned each receive their own room, ensuring that insights from completed projects remain available for future initiatives.
- Knowledge maps and skills matrices can be created as pages and updated on a regular basis.
- Mentoring processes are managed in dedicated rooms with tasks, meetings, and documentation, making progress transparent for both mentors and mentees.
A practical tip: Involve the staff council at an early stage. As soon as expert directories or skills matrices contain personal data, their approval is typically required. Addressing this early makes the rollout significantly smoother.
Knowledge management with Stackfield: Processes, communication, and knowledge in one tool
Public authorities do not need an additional software layer alongside specialist applications, wikis, and chat tools when project management, communication, and documentation come together in one sovereign platform. Knowledge is created where work happens: in tasks, discussions, and pages within a shared room. This work-related knowledge remains available when people leave because it is not stored in a separate system that no one maintains.
The next step in the decision-making process is straightforward: a 14-day trial with a specific pilot area, such as the building authority before the next retirement wave or the HR department with high onboarding effort. This allows the organization to evaluate under real working conditions whether the platform supports day-to-day operations, instead of relying only on feature lists and demos.
Start a pilot area before knowledge is lost No tool sprawl, no knowledge loss during the next staff transition: start your Stackfield pilot with the area that most urgently needs structure, whether it is the building authority, school administration, or HR department.
Start your pilot area now
FAQ
Can Stackfield replace a DMS or only complement it?
Stackfield does not replace a legally compliant long-term archive. It is the active work system where knowledge is created in context: tasks, discussions, and pages. The DMS handles the final storage of completed processes. Both systems run in parallel, as already practiced in Aschaffenburg, for example.
How can public authorities preserve employee knowledge before retirement?
The minimum standard is a combination of expert debriefing, a structured handover room in Stackfield, and a knowledge map. A time frame of six to twelve months before departure should be planned. This way, knowledge is captured during the ongoing work process, not only shortly before the departing employee’s final working day.
How do we get employees to actually use the platform?
Start with a small pilot area in a department that already has intrinsic motivation, let managers visibly lead by example, and connect the platform to daily workflows instead of positioning it as a separate knowledge maintenance tool. The strongest incentive for long-term use is noticeable time savings in everyday work.
How long does it realistically take to introduce a knowledge management tool in a public authority?
Plan two to three months for a pilot phase, followed by six to twelve months for a gradual rollout. Full integration with specialist applications may take longer depending on complexity. The key challenge is not the technical tool rollout itself, but the accompanying cultural change, which requires time and visible leadership support. Optimized change management can support the introduction of new tools.
How does Stackfield integrate external parties such as engineering firms or other municipalities?
External parties receive restricted rights as guests or external users, without access to internal rooms. This allows engineering firms or partner municipalities to be seamlessly integrated into shared projects without requiring permanent licenses for short-term contributors. Practical examples from Aschaffenburg and Gießen show that this model already works reliably in municipal administration.